From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18888 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2013 02:54:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18876 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2013 02:54:12 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 02:54:11 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1USIVd-00016Z-1r from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:54:09 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:54:08 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:54:08 -0700 Message-ID: <516E0ED2.2080203@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:54:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] print '--with{,out}-babeltrace' in 'gdb --configuration' References: <1365761475-23845-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83fvyr58c5.fsf@gnu.org> <516DEDAD.8070902@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00517.txt.bz2 On 04/17/2013 08:55 AM, Doug Evans wrote: > nit: For a canadian cross, s/(on host)/(on build)/ and s/(on target)/(on host)/. > Oh, you are right. > It's certainly less useful, but since we're going down this path I > wanted to at least raise the question. > GCC prints this info. > Yes, 'gcc -###' prints some directories on the build machine. > Also, I wonder if we shouild print prefix and/or exec_prefix. > We print "(relocatable)" for relocatable directories but I'm left > guessing what the root of the relocatable tree is. > [We also don't explain what "relocatable" means AFAICS. I know, but I > can imagine a user wondering.] The "relocatable" is unclear to me unless I checked configure.ac and previous discussions. -- Yao (齐尧)