From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-100397-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14882 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2013 08:37:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 14832 invoked by uid 89); 11 Apr 2013 08:37:15 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:37:14 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3B8b9Z2014867	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 11 Apr 2013 04:37:09 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3B8b7Vk019772;	Thu, 11 Apr 2013 04:37:08 -0400
Message-ID: <51667633.4050800@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:03:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
CC: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>, Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>,        Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>,        gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix dprintf work not right if it is pending
References: <CANFwon3OdcsC3PQRwteYPKiBYFFKGPcOfMVcc4Fx8XdjZ=-pQw@mail.gmail.com> <515B1DF7.3090705@redhat.com> <515EF6A3.2080704@redhat.com> <CANFwon2UZwnHqCuEtSbSz6z82tr2HciU0QfiQS2dacFdFcvMFg@mail.gmail.com> <CANFwon11DSoU5jiHX4G7RGuxBOZRaXD6Cth6Ob3X_Z0-TgnPXw@mail.gmail.com> <5162D6A9.2070706@redhat.com> <CANFwon3rTwU1AkmeWAoHJZLH=DFrwMzbazK06M5UgBbSn7ZJ2A@mail.gmail.com> <51640391.2040801@redhat.com> <CANFwon0Dmnsq50NgQ6BrPNVA5uQnEgUmsksr2SODBHp7A60ZBw@mail.gmail.com> <CANFwon19-Mk3tEejLC-hoQcFLqzcY-6-2Fw0vRYPCfYmbSquvQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130411012601.GH24389@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130411012601.GH24389@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2

On 04/11/2013 02:26 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-04/msg00097.html
>> This is a bug fix.  Can I check it in to 7.6 branch?
> 
> Not sure if the patch is considered safe enough, but it should only
> affect dprintf, so no objection. Pedro, would it be OK with you?

Yes, I think it's safe enough to put it in 7.6.

Thanks,
-- 
Pedro Alves