From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2478 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2013 16:48:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2469 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2013 16:48:16 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:48:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r34GmCwY023017 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 12:48:12 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r34GmAVP012349; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 12:48:11 -0400 Message-ID: <515DAECA.1050105@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 07:21:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sandra Loosemore CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] fix remote host test failures in gdb.base/dup-sect.exp References: <515CF061.1090508@codesourcery.com> <515D5F6A.6000801@redhat.com> <515DA554.7040500@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <515DA554.7040500@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 On 04/04/2013 05:07 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > Ah, you are right -- we have a local patch that hacks gdb_gnu_strip_debug to DTRT and adds the remote-host copy code to gdb.base/sepdebug.exp. > > I'll withdraw this patch since we clearly need to merge it with the other unsubmitted changes. Ack. > Or, a simpler but less useful change would be do disable all the tests that depend on separate debug information in remote-host testing. Yeah, it'll end up being throw away work given you already have the right solution. But I'll approve it if you send it. -- Pedro Alves