From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18637 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2013 02:39:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18621 invoked by uid 89); 25 Mar 2013 02:39:52 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from oarmail.oarcorp.com (HELO OARmail.OARCORP.com) (67.63.146.244) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 02:39:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.14] (24.96.88.41) by OARmail.OARCORP.com (192.168.2.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:39:47 -0500 Message-ID: <514FB8F2.9060702@oarcorp.com> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:40:00 -0000 From: Joel Sherrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Simulator dv-sockser.o patch testing Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00907.txt.bz2 `Hi I tested three configurations: + gdb 7.5.91 as baseline + gdb head with my last acinclude.m4 patch + gdb head with Mike's acinclude.m4 patch I tested these 10 targets [1]: bfin-elf cris-elf frv-elf iq2000-elf lm32-elf m32r-elf m68hc11-elf mips-elf mn10300-elf sh64-elf with: (1) no simulator option, (2) --disable-sim-hardware and (3) --enable-sim-hardware This is a total of 30 builds. gdb 7.5.91 and my patch built 27 of the 30 and failed to bfin-elf, m68hc11-elf, and mn10300-elf with --disable-sim-hardware. Mike's patch let them all build. The only discrepancy in the make check summary was that WITH Mike's patch cris-elf with --enable-sim-hardware has this: === sim Summary === # of expected passes 304 # of untested testcases 136 In the 7.5.91 log, the 136 was 170. I know absolutely nothing about cris and only ran this because the configure file changed after running autoconf. Nothing specific to the cris was changed. This could be something else going on. As far as I can tell, Mike's patch is an improvement over mine and what was in 7.5.91. If he regenerates the configure scripts that need it, I would be perfectly happy with his patch being applied. This is the set of files which were touched by his patch or regenerated in my tree: # modified: sim/bfin/configure # modified: sim/common/acinclude.m4 # modified: sim/cris/configure # modified: sim/frv/configure # modified: sim/iq2000/configure # modified: sim/lm32/configure # modified: sim/m32r/configure # modified: sim/m68hc11/configure # modified: sim/mips/configure # modified: sim/mn10300/configure # modified: sim/sh64/configure Mike, can you commit yours? Please. :) [1] I forgot to include mipstx39-elf in the targets built against all three versions. I did run it against Mike's by hand and it is OK. -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985