From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25735 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2013 15:14:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25711 invoked by uid 89); 23 Mar 2013 15:14:03 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from oarmail.oarcorp.com (HELO OARmail.OARCORP.com) (67.63.146.244) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:14:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.14] (24.96.88.41) by OARmail.OARCORP.com (192.168.2.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:13:58 -0500 Message-ID: <514DC6B5.7080207@oarcorp.com> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:38:00 -0000 From: Joel Sherrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: Joel Brobecker , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "palves@redhat.com" , "jan.kratochvil@redhat.com" , "ralf.corsepius@rtems.org" , "vapier@gentoo.org" Subject: Re: one week to gdb-7.6 release? References: <20130320160032.GC5447@adacore.com> <83vc8myoyb.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83vc8myoyb.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00874.txt.bz2 On 3/20/2013 12:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:00:32 -0700 >> From: Joel Brobecker >> Cc: Pedro Alves , Jan Kratochvil , Ralf Corsepius , Mike Frysinger , Joel Sherrill >> >> We're about one week away from our tentative date for gdb-7.6 release, >> and I was wondering how we are doing, and whether there might be >> some issues that might prevent us from releasing around our planned >> date. >> >> I know of: >> >> * PR/15289 set remote hardware-watchpoint-limit" broken (zinteger commands) >> (regression) >> Easy to fix, or just revert the patch that caused the regression? >> >> * dv-sockser.o build issues in the sim. >> Looks like the thread lost steam a bit - can we stoke the fire again? > I just committed the dv-sockser.o fix to the 4.6 branch and head. -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985