From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8948 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2013 09:36:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8580 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2013 09:36:47 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:36:44 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UIFRq-0003Qi-Ep from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 02:36:42 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 02:36:42 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 02:36:41 -0700 Message-ID: <514982F1.4080906@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:10:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CC: , Franck Jullien Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove doc on OpenRISC 1000 References: <1363576183-5544-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1363700147.23712.277.camel@laria> In-Reply-To: <1363700147.23712.277.camel@laria> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00730.txt.bz2 [My mail sent yesterday didn't show in the mail archive, so send it again.] On 03/19/2013 09:35 PM, Jeremy Bennett wrote: > It is quite likely the GDB code for OpenRISC 1000 was never submitted. > The whole GNU tool chain was developed around 2000-2002, but only > binutils ever committed its code. The tool chain is still widely used > and maintained atwww.opencores.org. Hi Jeremy, The patch was submitted in the link I gave in my first mail, but only the doc bit was approved and committed. I can't tell why the non-doc bits were not approved. > > I've copied Franck Jullien, who is the most active developer of the > OpenRISC GDB port at present (I was in the past). The alternative to > deleting the documentation is to submit the port. If the port can be submitted soon (in 2~3 months maybe?), I am fine to keep the doc there, because it has been there for 10 years. Otherwise, I prefer to remove them first, personally. -- Yao (齐尧)