From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6587 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2013 15:44:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 6579 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2013 15:44:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:44:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2FFiIVY030077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:44:19 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2FFiHaQ016551; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:44:17 -0400 Message-ID: <514341D0.5060805@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:22:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New ARI warning Fri Mar 15 02:02:12 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-03-15-gmt References: <20130315020212.GA23545@sourceware.org> <5142E409.5090109@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <5142E409.5090109@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00671.txt.bz2 On 03/15/2013 09:04 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 03/15/2013 10:02 AM, GDB Administrator wrote: >>> gdb/ctf.c:223: regression: LITTLE_ENDIAN: Do not use LITTLE_ENDIAN, instead use BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE >> gdb/ctf.c:223: BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN ? ' : '); > > Hmmm, I'd like to write CTF in the host-endianness, Why's that? > while BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE is about the target-endianness. The other way to fix this warning is to use "native endianness" that CTF understands. I'll have a try. -- Pedro Alves