From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29870 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2013 14:57:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 29862 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2013 14:57:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:57:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2EEvMRQ031571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:57:22 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2EEvJQt002366; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:57:20 -0400 Message-ID: <5141E54F.4090106@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:57:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Pedro Alves , Hui Zhu , gdb-patches ml , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [commit+7.6] [patch+7.6] [TUI] Fix scrolling crash 7.6 regression [Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb crash with tui] References: <513F7592.2080902@redhat.com> <20130313185456.GA18563@host2.jankratochvil.net> <5141C38B.1080204@redhat.com> <20130314144035.GA11439@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20130314144035.GA11439@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00635.txt.bz2 On 03/14/2013 02:40 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >> > I'm wondering about whether this "fullname" handling gross-ness in the >> > TUI is really necessary. >> > (...) >> > Haven't tried that yet (for >7.6) ... > Probably not but I was fixing absolute pathnames across GDB, not fixing TUI. > I am still not done with the absolute pathnames task. I did not suggest you do it yourself. > Checked in: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-03/msg00133.html > and for 7.6: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-03/msg00134.html Thanks. -- Pedro Alves