From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8753 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2013 10:36:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 8691 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2013 10:36:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:36:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r27AafHK014373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 05:36:42 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r27AaeR9010022; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 05:36:40 -0500 Message-ID: <51386DB7.7080302@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:36:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve built-in documentation for pagination commands References: <8338w71pzs.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <8338w71pzs.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2 On 03/07/2013 10:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I frequently waste too much time looking up these commands, because I > constantly forget their names. So I decided to improve their doc > strings so that 'apropos' will find them easier, and also to mention > the special value of zero explicitly. > > Any objections to the changeset below? I think this looks great. -- Pedro Alves