From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23855 invoked by alias); 7 May 2002 16:27:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23821 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 16:27:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freya.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.14) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2002 16:27:03 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.2) with ESMTP id BKB51649; Tue, 7 May 2002 19:26:30 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 09:27:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: petrs@caldera.com Message-Id: <5137-Tue07May2002192540+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3CD7EDA7.111E6F4B@caldera.com> (message from Petr Sorfa on Tue, 07 May 2002 11:07:19 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFA] Generalizing compiler invocation for FORTRAN95 testsuite Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3CD7EDA7.111E6F4B@caldera.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 11:07:19 -0400 > From: Petr Sorfa > > Would it also be a good idea to create a gdb.fortran95 directory under > gdb/testsuite/? I'd prefer gdb.f95, to avoid file-name clashes with gdb.fortran on 8+3 filesystems.