From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20090 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 17:57:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20077 invoked from network); 10 May 2003 17:57:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2003 17:57:48 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (cable-130-147.inter.net.il [213.8.130.147]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id BDC39202; Sat, 10 May 2003 20:57:40 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 17:57:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: schwab@suse.de Message-Id: <5137-Sat10May2003205400+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: hjl@lucon.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 10 May 2003 17:39:04 +0200) Subject: Re: PATCH: Make sure gdb-cfg.texi is created Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20030509122434.A5769@lucon.org> <2593-Sat10May2003124532+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 17:39:04 +0200 > > `test -e' is POSIX, but not supported by some older shells (according to > the autoconf docs Solaris 2.5 does not have it). What version of POSIX standardizes it? If Solaris 2.5 doesn't have it, I'd be very uneasy about using it. Did we discontinue support for Solaris 2.5?