From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6770 invoked by alias); 10 May 2002 16:33:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6633 invoked from network); 10 May 2002 16:33:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freya.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.14) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2002 16:33:42 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.2) with ESMTP id BKK58145; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:33:26 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:33:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: jimb@redhat.com Message-Id: <5137-Fri10May2002193224+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on 10 May 2002 10:55:45 -0500) Subject: Re: RFA: add macro commands Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20020509235822.DC4F95EA11@zwingli.cygnus.com> <8011-Fri10May2002101418+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00341.txt.bz2 > From: Jim Blandy > Date: 10 May 2002 10:55:45 -0500 > > I think a better change would be to simply include macro names in the > completion process. Yes, if you can make make_symbol_completion_list complete on macros as well as on other symbols, it would be great.