From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8173 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2013 17:42:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 7959 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2013 17:41:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:41:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1RHfhDe022022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:41:43 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1RHffTA012818; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:41:42 -0500 Message-ID: <512E4554.9030900@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:15:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller CC: "'Maciej W. Rozycki'" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [committed] Fix MIPS frame prologue scan problem References: <00a501cd495e$db6adea0$92409be0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <002a01cd5043$a0e9f310$e2bdd930$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <005901cdcbef$c4a28560$4de79020$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <512a8b93.0956420a.2e81.ffffd74aSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <512a8b93.0956420a.2e81.ffffd74aSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00696.txt.bz2 On 02/24/2013 09:51 PM, Pierre Muller wrote: > I did not find any gdb_7_6-branch yet, which probably means > that this will be in 7.6 release, no? Right, 7.6 has not branched yet. -- Pedro Alves