From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24537 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2013 09:32:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 24528 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Feb 2013 09:32:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:32:04 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UAGtG-0003it-Nn from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:32:02 -0800 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:32:01 -0800 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:32:01 -0800 Message-ID: <512C80DA.5070600@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:32:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Subject: Re: [patch] gdb/CONTRIBUTE update References: <20130221202629.GA30015@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20130221202629.GA30015@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00645.txt.bz2 On 02/22/2013 04:26 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > + Patch from a contributor needs a review with approval from > + maintainer. Still you drive the review process and inclusion > + process of the patch. If there is no reply in a week send a new > + mail (not reply) with PING in its subject. Occasionally even > + a PING^2 mail may be needed in another week of no replise. > + Jan, why do we have to post the patch again in the new mail instead of a reply to remind maintainers to review? If the patch is still applied clearly, I don't see the benefits of doing that. -- Yao (齐尧)