From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3623 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2013 18:55:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 3610 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2013 18:55:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:54:23 +0000 Received: from cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:54:22 +0000 Received: from [10.1.72.50] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:54:20 +0000 Message-ID: <5102D4DB.6010802@arm.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:55:00 -0000 From: Marcus Shawcroft User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64-tdep basic port. References: <51028E3D.4030708@arm.com> <5102C7C0.50209@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5102C7C0.50209@redhat.com> X-MC-Unique: 113012518542200301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00643.txt.bz2 On 25/01/13 17:58, Pedro Alves wrote: > Okay. Seems odd to me to just be clear the low bits and > doing nothing else if they're "reserved", instead of waiting > until they do have some meaning (at which point GDB will > necessarily need to learn to do something about them). Does > actually end up seeing non-4 bytes instructions today somehow? It would be safe to remove this masking code today, if you prefer. /Marcus