From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28086 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2013 19:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 28078 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jan 2013 19:59:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:59:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0MJxm1I014774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:59:48 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0MJxkqM008871; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:59:47 -0500 Message-ID: <50FEEFB1.1080703@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:59:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Suppress repeated annotations until GDB is ready to accept input. References: <20121121201416.1015.36832.stgit@brno.lan> <20121121201429.1015.6037.stgit@brno.lan> <87vccsics1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50B3B4BC.2010108@redhat.com> <87sj7udgrj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87sj7udgrj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00536.txt.bz2 On 11/27/2012 06:48 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > > I don't think there is. When I tried just editing the gdb command line > I ended up with a lot of "^Z^Z" in the gud buffer. I guess you could > dig up Emacs 23 (still in F16...) or try to downgrade the gud code. While everyone is racing to install F18, I've set up a F16 VM instead to test this with Emacs 23. I've ran a few manual tests, trying to exercise the code paths, with both --annotate=3 (which is what gud on E23 wants to use by default), and --annotate=2. I didn't see anything go wrong. I also tried some background/async commands, and it didn't look like Emacs got any more confused than with the stock gdb. Regression testing on x86_64 Fedora 17 didn't show any regression. I'm putting the series in now. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves