From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-97898-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2504 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2013 15:43:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 2494 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jan 2013 15:43:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:43:20 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0MFhAfK016710	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:43:13 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0MFA1Zw017138;	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:10:01 -0500
Message-ID: <50FEABC8.2040805@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:43:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kaushik Phatak <Kaushik.Phatak@kpitcummins.com>
CC: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,        "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,        Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA 3/5] New port: CR16: gdb port
References: <20121022224107.GB3713@adacore.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B3E44A@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com> <20121023135502.GA3555@adacore.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B3EB9E@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com> <20121115174313.GC3790@adacore.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B614E5@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com> <20121122175010.GG9964@adacore.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65848567829@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com> <20130117085919.GA3564@adacore.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65848569146@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com> <20130118141649.GK3564@adacore.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65848577561@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65848577561@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2

(trimming CC)

On 01/22/2013 01:49 PM, Kaushik Phatak wrote:

> I am working on few points raised by Pedro on the gdbserver, hopefully that 
> would not affect my gdb code.

I think we should hold the gdb bits until the gdbserver parts are settled,
as we're discussing core register numbering issues.

What did you think of my suggestions/comments to the gdb patch?

-- 
Pedro Alves