From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19712 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2013 18:44:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 19617 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2013 18:44:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:43:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0AIhnIT014530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:43:50 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0AIhlSA006853; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:43:48 -0500 Message-ID: <50EF0BE3.6040503@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:44:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergio Durigan Junior CC: Jan Kratochvil , GDB Patches , Binutils Development , "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 02/02 v2] Refactor PRPSINFO handling on GDB References: <20121218171555.GA19639@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121231194134.GA17955@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 The subject is a bit misleading, as this does more than just refactoring PRPSINFO handling; it dumps more fields as well. Splitting the refactoring and the actual extending into separate patches, along with a short description of what's new in the cores would have been neat, but I'm coming back late to the party, and don't insist. > + /* Generating and copying the program's arguments. `get_inferior_args' > + may throw, but we want to continue the execution anyway. */ > + TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR) > + { > + infargs = get_inferior_args (); > + } > + Hmm? We were not doing that before. What exception is that? -- Pedro Alves