From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2523 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2013 17:54:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 2504 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2013 17:54:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:54:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r08HsZDw030029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:54:36 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r08HsXJA025518; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:54:33 -0500 Message-ID: <50EC5D58.3010503@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:54:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kaushik Phatak CC: nick clifton , Tom Tromey , "binutils@sourceware.org" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [RFA] New port: CR16: BFD Changes required by the gdb port References: <50CB6CA4.1060901@redhat.com> <50E431EF.5030904@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 On 01/08/2013 11:24 AM, Kaushik Phatak wrote: > Hi Nick, > Thanks for applying these changes with appropriate Changelogs. > > I noticed that the entries for cr16 were missing in the latest gdb snapshot > in configure.ac and configure. > > cr16-*-*) > noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb" > ;; > This entry is present in the 7.5 release version of gdb but not > in the latest snapshot, gdb-7.5.50.20130108 > > How is this controlled, in gcc or here? Could you please throw some light on this. On gdb's git mirror, I see: commit ce3c5eda0b8d664790bc633a1013193a3289dff0 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun Aug 26 14:34:38 2012 +0000 Sync toplevel files with GCC tree ... - cr16-*-*) - noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb" - ;; d10v-*-*) noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libgloss" ;; @@ -924,7 +939,8 @@ case "${target}" in noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs libgui itcl ld" ;; ia64*-*-*vms*) - noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs libgui itcl" + # No ld support yet. + noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs libgui itcl ld" ;; i[[3456789]]86-w64-mingw*) ;; @@ -1069,16 +1085,13 @@ case "${host}" in *-mingw*) host_makefile_frag="config/mh-mingw" ;; - *-interix*) - host_makefile_frag="config/mh-interix" - ;; hppa*-hp-hpux10*) host_makefile_frag="config/mh-pa-hpux10" ;; hppa*-hp-hpux*) host_makefile_frag="config/mh-pa" ;; - hppa*-*) + hppa*-*) host_makefile_frag="config/mh-pa" ;; Dunno why these were removed with that merge. The ChangeLog entries brought in don't seen to mention these changes. Maybe it was a merge error where local binutils changes were lost? > Please let me know if I need to submit any patch for this as couple of hunks > from my gdb patch are failing due to this. Please always base the work you submit against the current development mainline. For GDB, that is: http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/ -- Pedro Alves