Hi,

On 12/07/2012 12:51 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 12/07/2012 12:48 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> And do you absolutely need the register to be of type (void *)
>> for the test to exercise the original problem? I don't know if
>> we can find any that's guaranteed to be of any type. So you might
>> have to use different register names depending on the target.
>>
>
> Yeah. I may need to do something different here. I didn't forget about
> this one though.
>
> Luis

Casting seems to be the most sensible solution to this problem.

This patch addresses the problem Andreas saw by creating a variable of 
type (void *). This way we are guaranteed to have the type we need to 
reproduce the problem.

I thought about replacing SP with PC, but SP is probably available for 
all targets.

What do you think?

Luis