From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16965 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2012 13:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 16937 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2012 13:48:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:48:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBEDmA2C010901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:48:10 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBEDm9aA032653; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:48:09 -0500 Message-ID: <50CB2E18.2090701@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:48:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Attach discard_pending_stop_replies to observer inferior_exit References: <1354848657-10348-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <50CAF720.9040704@redhat.com> <50CB29D2.4000205@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <50CB29D2.4000205@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00496.txt.bz2 On 12/14/2012 01:29 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 12/14/2012 05:53 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> GDB can be learning about new processes it didn't know about yet >> from some yet-unprocessed stop reply. So if we only clear stop replies >> specific to each inferior, we'd leave those behind. But, we're closing >> the remote target here. We really want to discard everything. > > I see, then I change 'discard_pending_stop_replies' a little that INF > is NULL means discard everything. This patch is tested on x86_64-linux > with native and gdbserver. OK? OK. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves