From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 515 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2012 18:13:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 492 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2012 18:13:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mms2.broadcom.com (HELO mms2.broadcom.com) (216.31.210.18) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:13:31 +0000 Received: from [10.9.200.133] by mms2.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.5)); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:10:30 -0800 X-Server-Uuid: 4500596E-606A-40F9-852D-14843D8201B2 Received: from mail-irva-13.broadcom.com (10.11.16.103) by IRVEXCHHUB02.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.9.200.133) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.247.2; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:12:53 -0800 Received: from [10.177.73.73] (unknown [10.177.73.73]) by mail-irva-13.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5096D41119; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:12:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50B7A5A1.1000808@broadcom.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:13:00 -0000 From: "Andrew Burgess" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ulrich Weigand" cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Vector to scalar casting and widening References: <201211291749.qATHnbBM030788@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <201211291749.qATHnbBM030788@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00885.txt.bz2 On 29/11/2012 5:49 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > As expected, given the above, a whole bunch of tests fail ... > Thanks for explaining. I'll take a look at this now I understand the issue better. Sorry for the confusion. Andrew