From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30445 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2012 14:55:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 30358 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Nov 2012 14:55:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:54:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qASEsnhv001752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:54:50 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qASEslMN025693; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:54:47 -0500 Message-ID: <50B625B6.8000007@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:55:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Metzger, Markus T" CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "markus.t.metzger@gmail.com" , "jan.kratochvil@redhat.com" , "tromey@redhat.com" , "kettenis@gnu.org" Subject: Re: [patch v4 04/13] configure: add check for perf_event header References: <1354013351-14791-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1354013351-14791-5-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <50B5E341.1090507@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00813.txt.bz2 On 11/28/2012 02:50 PM, Metzger, Markus T wrote: > Am I OK to commit the revised version or do you want me to send it out for review again? I already moved it to the beginning of the patch series, so it would appear as patch 1, next time. No need to resend at this time. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves