From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16432 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2012 16:56:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 16414 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2012 16:56:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:56:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qARGuCpb031672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:56:12 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qARGu9AP027510; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:56:10 -0500 Message-ID: <50B4F0A9.9000102@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:56:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: markus.t.metzger@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com, tromey@redhat.com, kettenis@gnu.org Subject: Re: [patch v4 01/13] disas: add precise instructions flag References: <1354013351-14791-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1354013351-14791-2-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <50B4EF0E.8080102@redhat.com> <20121127165202.GA5914@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20121127165202.GA5914@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00756.txt.bz2 On 11/27/2012 04:52 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:49:18 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 11/27/2012 10:48 AM, markus.t.metzger@intel.com wrote: >>> From: Markus Metzger >>> >>> When disassembling an address range with interleaved sources, >> >> What you mean by interleaved? "disasm /m" ? >> >>> the addresses that >>> are being disassembled may not exactly match the specified range. >> >> Is this another symptom of the issue that "disasm /m" sorts by >> line number, rather than the much more reasonable sort-by-address, >> which is IIRC what objdump does too? > > objdump does it differently (IMO corrently) than GDB: Yes, that's what I meant. > > Tracked at: > disassemble/m should be PC-driven, not source line driven > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11833 Thanks. -- Pedro Alves