On 10/30/2012 08:57 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 10/17/2012 08:42 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>> On 10/04/2012 09:48 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Most of the targets we deal with need to be told to lift off breakpoints
>>> from the inferior prior to single-stepping. A few targets are able to
>>> just step over those breakpoints without being told so.
>>>
>>> In the latter case, GDB assumes the target knows how to manage
>>> breakpoints on its own.
>>>
>>> gdbserver does not know how to do this unless we force this mechanism
>>> into it, but, honestly, i don't see the point. Usually targets that know
>>> how to step over breakpoints do so via a more low level interface like
>>> the kernel. Let me know if you think otherwise.
>>
>>
>
> Ping? http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-10/msg00067.html
>

Meanwhile i've updated this patch for the latest cvs head.

I'm wondering if the patch is too ugly for someone to take a look at it 
or if it is too odd a feature to add. I suppose not.

Hopefully i can get some traction with this new refreshed and shiny 
version! :-)

Luis