From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15923 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2012 08:03:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 15906 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2012 08:03:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FROM_12LTRDOM,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:03:24 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1TdG8Z-00020I-Nw from Yao_Qi@mentor.com for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:03:23 -0800 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:03:23 -0800 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:03:22 -0800 Message-ID: <50B473AC.5070604@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120911 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: [committed]: [PATCH 0/4] Fix member pointer bugs References: <1353569539-744-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <1353569539-744-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00698.txt.bz2 On 11/22/2012 03:32 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > Hello, > This patch set fixes GDB bugs on member pointers. This patch was > written by Daniel, I took it, and split it to four patches to make > each one more readable. Each one is quite self-explained, so I don't > put much words here. > > Regression tested on x86_64-linux. Is it OK? > Thanks for the review. This whole series are checked in in one commit. -- Yao (齐尧)