From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1443 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2012 18:22:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1433 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2012 18:21:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:21:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qANILq9d029162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:21:52 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qANILpdv025081; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:21:51 -0500 Message-ID: <50AFBEBE.5070904@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:22:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch+7.5.1] Work around PR libc/13097 "linux-vdso.so.1" #3 References: <20121122201737.GA32172@host2.jankratochvil.net> <50AF65E1.1090308@redhat.com> <20121123123952.GA15371@host2.jankratochvil.net> <50AF9DBF.1090406@redhat.com> <20121123172814.GH9964@adacore.com> <20121123181650.GA29882@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20121123181650.GA29882@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2 On 11/23/2012 06:16 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:28:14 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> It seems that the resolution is still under discussion. Let me know >> if you'd like me to hold the release while this is being discussed. > > I expected it will be easier, as I will therefore start communication on > glibc list go ahead with the release. Thinking about this a bit, I realized that I guess the glibc change allows having a separate debug info file on the file system for the vdso, and having that just work (a "simpler" alternative to buildid matching). So from that perspective, the change seems to have been justified. (but I don't know whether that was the rationale). -- Pedro Alves