From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23945 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2012 11:59:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 23934 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2012 11:59:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:59:04 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1TbruR-0000p0-Gg from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 03:59:03 -0800 Received: from NA1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.181]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 03:59:02 -0800 Received: from [0.0.0.0] ([172.16.63.104]) by NA1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 03:59:02 -0800 Message-ID: <50AF650B.8000708@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:59:00 -0000 From: Luis Machado Reply-To: lgustavo@codesourcery.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch+7.5.1] Work around PR libc/13097 "linux-vdso.so.1" #3 References: <20121122201737.GA32172@host2.jankratochvil.net> <50AF5E5C.5030205@mentor.com> <20121123114059.GA12995@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20121123114059.GA12995@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2 On 11/23/2012 09:40 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:30:36 +0100, Luis Gustavo wrote: >> I don't know about the others, but i find the name >> "solib_not_found_is_ok" a little odd. > > Me too. > > >> What about "is_ignored_dso", or "ignored_solib_p" or something in those >> veins? > > The problem is they are not ignored. > > >> What about linux-gate(32|64).so? > > I have not found any: > egrep -r 'linux-gate(32|64)' linux > > Have you? Sure the grep above may miss it. I saw a patch addressing this name in libc, but it is a few months old. Maybe this is just old naming. I checked out the sources and it's gone now. Luis