From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29169 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2012 15:53:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 29154 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2012 15:53:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:53:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qALFrB1Q022497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:53:12 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qALFr9jZ002451; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:53:10 -0500 Message-ID: <50ACF8E5.1060903@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:53:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kv.bhat@samsung.com CC: Mark Kettenis , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for incorect breakpoint set in case of clang compiled binary References: <32244670.52091353512361480.JavaMail.weblogic@epml02> In-Reply-To: <32244670.52091353512361480.JavaMail.weblogic@epml02> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00570.txt.bz2 On 11/21/2012 03:39 PM, KARTHIKVENKATESH BHAT wrote: > Thanks Pedro/Mark. Appologies for the build break. I'm a bit new to GDB community will take care of it from next time. No problem. Each of your recent replies breaks the email threading, as if you composed a new email, instead of replying to a previous message -- AFAICS, your replies miss an In-Reply-To header. Is there any way you could fix that? E.g., see http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-11/ and notice how your replies don't have "References: " links at the bottom, unlike other replies on other threads, e.g., . (You can follow the "Raw text" link to see the email headers of your replies.) -- Pedro Alves