From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1008 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 16:09:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 999 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2012 16:09:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:09:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAFG9BYA032603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:09:11 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAFG99oC027432; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:09:10 -0500 Message-ID: <50A513A5.1010208@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:09:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Remove AC_HEADER_STAT from configure.ac References: <50a4aadb.c54c420a.715f.5d53SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <50A4C0C5.8020901@redhat.com> <22837.8922366121$1352989522@news.gmane.org> <87fw4a26lk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87fw4a26lk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00410.txt.bz2 On 15-11-2012 16:06, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller writes: > > Pierre> PS: In the regenerated files, > Pierre> I discovered that configure has a strange, apparently unrelated > Pierre> change... Is this normal? > > It can be. Sometimes someone will use the wrong autoconf to regenerate > the configure script, or sometimes someone will forget to run it after a > change. I re-ran autoconf on pristine mainline with pristine FSF autoconf 2.64, and configure doesn't change. I looks more like either his version of autoconf is patched. -- Pedro Alves