From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30414 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 16:04:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 30401 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2012 16:04:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:04:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAFG4DCS026954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:04:13 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAFG4BXI024952; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:04:12 -0500 Message-ID: <50A5127B.4000309@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:04:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip gcore-buffer-overflow.exp on windows References: <1352991707-29104-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <1352991707-29104-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 On 15-11-2012 15:01, Yao Qi wrote: > > +# Skip this test on Windows; the long filename is not allowed. > +if { [ishost "i?86-*-mingw*"] } { > + untested gcore-buffer-overflow.exp In untested calls, please spell out the reason the test ends up untested, instead of just writing the test name, as with the latter we just end up with the test name duplicated in the gdb.sum output. > + return -1 > +} -- Pedro Alves