From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16238 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2012 19:14:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 16230 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2012 19:14:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:14:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA9JEYlj026705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:14:34 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA9JEXlo027253; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:14:34 -0500 Message-ID: <509D5619.7050306@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:14:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121016 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Multi-process + multi-arch: GDB References: <20121109015149.13597.39322.stgit@brno.lan> <87lieaeisb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <509D4BCA.6020704@redhat.com> <87haoyeiev.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <509D4FC9.2060208@redhat.com> <877gpuegsb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <877gpuegsb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00262.txt.bz2 On 11/09/2012 07:07 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > I picked 'target_gdbarch ()' just due to the long history of using this > name. That's a good reasoning too. > Here's the patch, let me know what you think. I made most of it with > 'perl -pi'. I only touched gdbarch.sh by hand. Looks good to me. Thanks! > Note the short-ish ChangeLog. I could perhaps write a more detailed > one, but in this case it hardly seemed worthwhile. That's fine. That's what we've always done for large, but trivial mechanical changes. -- Pedro Alves