From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3433 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2012 18:11:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 3419 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Nov 2012 18:11:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:11:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA5IBAnH026164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:11:10 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA5IB9Q2004618; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:11:09 -0500 Message-ID: <5098013C.8030101@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:11:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121016 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: handle new NT_SIGINFO note in gdb References: <878vanyj3k.fsf__16012.8015945249$1351617533$gmane$org@fleche.redhat.com> <87d2zxrvuw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87390rq319.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <509418AC.2060404@redhat.com> <87liejol6s.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87liejol6s.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 On 11/02/2012 07:32 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Here's an update. This takes a bit of a brute force approach to testing > that just one thread got a SEGV. Thanks. Looks fine to me. -- Pedro Alves