From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5104 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2012 15:50:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 5086 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2012 15:50:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:50:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA2FoUhJ020337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:50:31 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA2FoTMX003422; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:50:30 -0400 Message-ID: <5093EBC5.50501@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:50:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121016 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org CC: Yao Qi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] new tracepoint downloaded MI notification. References: <1348793347-12556-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1348793347-12556-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <5065E1E9.5040204@redhat.com> <5065E292.4000606@redhat.com> <506701EC.7040703@codesourcery.com> <509166FD.3050805@redhat.com> <5091C383.1080705@codesourcery.com> <5093EAE2.4090301@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5093EAE2.4090301@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 On 11/02/2012 03:46 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> > FAOD, we should continue to use {number, location number}, and it requires improvement of breakpoint re-setting, correct? > Yes. Though AFAICS, current notifications and commands use 'number="N.M"', not '{number, location number}'. And FAOD, The "yes" was for the first question. I'm not sure what you meant by "it", but the notification should not be blocked by that. Let me grok the responses on the usefulness of the notification though (and continue the discussion there, if necessary). -- Pedro Alves