Hi Tom,

On 10/17/2012 10:13 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Luis" == Luis Machado<lgustavo@codesourcery.com>  writes:
>
> Luis>  +	&&  TYPE_CODE (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (result)) != TYPE_CODE_VOID)
>
> On further reflection, I have a question and a comment.
>
> First, perhaps instead of excluding void* here, we should only allow
> pointers to structs.  That is the only case that has RTTI anyhow.  What
> do you think?
>
> Also, I think this needs a check_typedef around TYPE_TARGET_TYPE.
>
> Tom

Thanks for the comments. I've addressed them in this new version, now 
with a testcase.

Hopefully the testcase is well-formed.

Thanks,
Luis