Re: [RFC] Target-defined breakpoints [3/9] notification async

[Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>]

On 10/24/2012 11:03 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
> This patch is the extend for the notification function.
> Current notification function cannot handle the packet when GDB doesn't
> want to send or receive packet from the remote target.
> This patch do the extend make GDB can handle the notification even if it
> doesn't send or receive packet.

Looks we have two set of 'async notification' stuff here :)  I am trying 
to set up an infrastructure of 'async notification' in gdb, so that 
other components can use it.  Patches are here,

   http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-10/msg00404.html
   [RFC 0/7 V3]A general notification in GDB RSP

It is general, not specific to any notifications, and scalable.  We've 
probably have two internal cases of using it, 'trace status change' and 
'stub/probe status change', so "Target-defined breakpoint" can use it 
easily as well.

Do you mind if I suggest maintainers to review my 'async notification' 
patches first?  Once they go in, we can rebase your patch on top of it. 
  I am sure your patch will be shorter dramatically then.  WDYT?  Or if 
you find my 'async notification' doesn't meet your needs, let me know.

-- 
Yao