From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2908 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2012 16:06:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 2892 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2012 16:06:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:06:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9IG6G31009436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:06:16 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9IG6Evq007374; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:06:15 -0400 Message-ID: <508028F6.3060105@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:06:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121009 Thunderbird/16.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Pedro Alves , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: probable rs6000-aix-tdep.c bug found by clang References: <87mwzk279g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121017212417.GP3050@adacore.com> <507FC786.50400@redhat.com> <20121018153304.GS3050@adacore.com> <5080244B.30601@redhat.com> <20121018155748.GT3050@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20121018155748.GT3050@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00330.txt.bz2 On 10/18/2012 04:57 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I now notice the PR predates the patch that added this (a8cfed2a), and >> it seems the patch was meant to fix exactly that single-step issue in >> the PR. So I guess we could close it. > > That was the first thing I started looking for when I eventually > checked the PR :-). I closed the ticket. > >> Searching bugzilla for aix finds a handful of PRs, and most looks >> quite old. I'd be nice to give them a little triage love. :-) > > I can add that to my list... Thanks. :-) -- Pedro Alves