From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56897 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2019 16:05:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 56888 invoked by uid 89); 2 Aug 2019 16:05:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:05:34 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BD9AC91; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [8.3 backport] Supress SIGTTOU when handling errors To: Alan Hayward , Pedro Alves , Andrew Burgess Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , nd References: <20190516155150.71826-1-alan.hayward@arm.com> <20190516180640.GS2568@embecosm.com> <3935437B-CD4F-4474-B84A-05859CE822DF@arm.com> <7483f478-44d2-b2ce-b0cb-3e984054305a@redhat.com> <20190526224253.GA5667@embecosm.com> <4e3c7da9-ac41-f3d5-edb6-3dbb2f4e1f3e@redhat.com> <73EE75AA-7C1D-41E1-A419-B204ED82B814@arm.com> From: Tom de Vries Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <507d074a-75ef-b3b1-f5f5-7230ded52685@suse.de> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <73EE75AA-7C1D-41E1-A419-B204ED82B814@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 On 28-05-19 11:39, Alan Hayward wrote: > > >> On 27 May 2019, at 19:03, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >> On 5/26/19 11:42 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: >>> * Alan Hayward [2019-05-24 12:36:43 +0000]: >>> >> >>>> Ok, agreed. >>>> >>>> Any objections to me pushing the original patch then? >>> >>> Not from me. >>> >>> Sorry for any delay I caused in getting the patch merged. >> >> Not at all. It was an interesting discussion and revealed that we >> need to clean up and clarify some comments at least. >> >> Thanks, >> Pedro Alves > > Ditto with what Pedro said, and pushed. > Hi, OK to backport to 8.3? The patch applies cleanly, and causes no regressions on x86_64-linux. Thanks, - Tom