From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20813 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2012 15:15:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 20796 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2012 15:15:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:15:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9GFFUYU012087 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:15:30 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9GFFSmf021338; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:15:29 -0400 Message-ID: <507D7A10.1060202@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:15:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121009 Thunderbird/16.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Kozlov CC: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "'Stan_Shebs@mentor.com'" , Vladimir Prus Subject: Re: PATCH fix start-time and stop-time in trace-status References: <506444DD.9040503@mentor.com> <87d317wlaa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50699D74.2090401@mentor.com> <87mwzna6u3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <507D7654.90206@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <507D7654.90206@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 On 10/16/2012 03:59 PM, Dmitry Kozlov wrote: > Hi Tom, > Pedro already asked to rewrite this patch at gdbserver-side and use hex instead of decimal. > See http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-10/msg00193.html > Could you setup one common opinion about what way is right? Since the RSP uses hex everywhere, the argument for keeping decimal format because it's human-readable in the remote log doesn't really hold. Instead, having different formats makes reading the logs _worse_ (forcing one to wonder "is this in hex, or in decimal"). Given that there's no backwards compatibility issue here, I much prefer fixing gdbserver. > It would very kind of you if you can look at other 2 related patches. I'm looking at them now. -- Pedro Alves