From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30978 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2012 22:33:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 30970 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Oct 2012 22:33:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:33:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9FMXb6s017186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:33:38 -0400 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9FMXZlI029739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:33:37 -0400 Message-ID: <507C8F3F.5050307@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:33:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA] Add support for class typedefs/add missing derivation.exp tests References: <506CD89F.4040101@redhat.com> <87ipaba59u.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <507C6910.7060009@redhat.com> <878vb7a4ie.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <878vb7a4ie.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 On 10/15/2012 01:01 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > > It's no problem. The patch is ok as-is. Thanks for explaining. I've committed this. Thank you, Tom. Keith