From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9290 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2012 11:29:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 9268 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Sep 2012 11:29:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:28:56 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1TDZVY-0002tF-19 from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:28:56 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:28:55 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:28:54 -0700 Message-ID: <50570945.10707@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:29:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Siddhesh Poyarekar CC: Subject: Re: [obv][commit] Replace one/two use variables with their values References: <20120917143102.467b3fce@spoyarek> <5056FC44.8090207@codesourcery.com> <20120917161521.682a1273@spoyarek> In-Reply-To: <20120917161521.682a1273@spoyarek> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 On 09/17/2012 06:45 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > These commits are an attempt to push in some of the more trivial fixes > independently so that the final changeset is as small as possible. The > net change size is still currently at about 7k lines, so I've not > succeeded all that much with this patch at my goal of reducing the > patch size, but I'm still trying:) > > Without these independent patches, the bitpos patch would have all > these local variables expanded to ULONGEST, which is more of a > mechanical change that can be avoided in the large patch. I got your point. That makes sense to me. Thanks. -- Yao