Re: [PATCH 2/2] MI notification on record started and stopped

Pedro Alves
2012-09-14T12:09:07Z

On 09/14/2012 12:44 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 05:49 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> The notification is like '=record-started,thread-group="i1"'.
>> ?? If this is a thread-group, why does i1 identify a_process_? Don't
>> you mean "thread group"?
>
> As matter of fact, this is an inferior, but in MI notification, we call "inferior" as "thread group", IIUC. So i1 identify an inferior. Your suggestion "the number assigned by @value{GDBN} to the inferior" is good to me.

In these cases, I'd just go and copy what is written in other similar
cases already in the manual. Should make the end overall result a bit more
consistent. For example, borrowing from the "-add-inferior" command's text,
you'd get something like:

"The notification has a single field, @samp{thread-group}, whose value is the
identifier of the thread group corresponding to the affected inferior."

--
Pedro Alves