Re: [PATCH 2/2] MI notification on record started and stopped

Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-14T13:30:31Z

> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:44:45 +0800
> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> On 09/14/2012 05:49 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> The notification is like '=record-started,thread-group="i1"'.
> > ?? If this is a thread-group, why does i1 identify a_process_? Don't
> > you mean "thread group"?
>
> As matter of fact, this is an inferior, but in MI notification, we call
> "inferior" as "thread group", IIUC. So i1 identify an inferior. Your
> suggestion "the number assigned by @value{GDBN} to the inferior" is good
> to me.

But all the other places that describe thread-group= fields talk about
thread groups, so I think we need to do that here for consistency.