From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2984 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2012 11:45:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 2973 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Sep 2012 11:45:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:45:41 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1TCUL6-0004WN-80 from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 04:45:40 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 04:45:40 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 04:45:38 -0700 Message-ID: <505318AD.50603@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:45:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MI notification on record started and stopped References: <1347434118-10931-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1347434118-10931-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <838vcfw2my.fsf@gnu.org> <50519FC6.3090704@codesourcery.com> <83r4q5vne6.fsf@gnu.org> <50529C21.5020909@codesourcery.com> <83boh9ue6b.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83boh9ue6b.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00279.txt.bz2 On 09/14/2012 05:49 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> The notification is like '=record-started,thread-group="i1"'. > ?? If this is a thread-group, why does i1 identify a_process_? Don't > you mean "thread group"? As matter of fact, this is an inferior, but in MI notification, we call "inferior" as "thread group", IIUC. So i1 identify an inferior. Your suggestion "the number assigned by @value{GDBN} to the inferior" is good to me. -- Yao