From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12969 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2012 14:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 12959 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2012 14:48:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mga02.intel.com (HELO mga02.intel.com) (134.134.136.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:48:28 +0000 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2012 07:48:27 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from mirceagh-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [172.28.205.68]) ([172.28.205.68]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2012 07:48:25 -0700 Message-ID: <504DFDB8.7090005@intel.com> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:48:00 -0000 From: Mircea Gherzan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: Marc Khouzam , "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" , "'mgherzan@gmail.com'" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the -catch-load and -catch-unload MI commands. References: <1346320317-1599-1-git-send-email-mircea.gherzan@intel.com> <503FA714.4020206@intel.com> <504DF49D.7070700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <504DF49D.7070700@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 Hi, Thank you for your feedback. On 10.09.2012 16:09, Pedro Alves wrote: > [...] > I don't this would be a good idea compared to separate commands. Each > of those catch variants takes different parameters/options. I'm not > seeing what putting them all under the same roof would buy. I am still in favour of having them as separate commands, but, if the=20 powers that be decide otherwise, I am willing to rework the patch. > In the CLI, although "catch exec", "catch fork", "catch syscall", etc. > have the same prefix, they're really implemented as separate commands > as well. > Please let me know if there are any issues that prevent this patch from=20 getting merged. Thanks, Mircea --=20 Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Peter Gleissner, Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwadere= r, Douglas Lusk Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052