From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-94289-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15787 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2012 09:31:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 15778 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Sep 2012 09:31:20 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:31:03 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q839UxCa010950	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Mon, 3 Sep 2012 05:30:59 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q839UvL6004561;	Mon, 3 Sep 2012 05:30:58 -0400
Message-ID: <504478D0.4040202@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:31:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kaushik Phatak <Kaushik.Phatak@kpitcummins.com>
CC: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,        "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,        Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New GDB Port CR16
References: <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B27868@KCHJEXMB03.kpit.com> <503B9E59.6050502@codesourcery.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B28084@KCHJEXMB03.kpit.com> <CAJaTeTrp4cCM6-0WybhzQnH_ZDBoa9xDhnW4+QGtaS7Un3Zv=Q@mail.gmail.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B2866D@KCHJEXMB03.kpit.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65845B2866D@KCHJEXMB03.kpit.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2

On 08/30/2012 06:23 AM, Kaushik Phatak wrote:
> --- gdb_src.orig/sim/cr16/interp.c	2012-06-18 05:04:17.000000000 +0530
> +++ ./gdb_src/sim/cr16/interp.c	2012-08-17 15:41:35.000000000 +0530
> @@ -1192,7 +1192,11 @@ sim_resume (SIM_DESC sd, int step, int s
>        iaddr = imem_addr ((uint32)PC);
>        if (iaddr == State.mem.fault)
>          {
> +#ifdef SIGBUS
>            State.exception = SIGBUS;
> +#else
> +          State.exception = SIGSEGV;
> +#endif
>            break;
>          }

Is this dependency on host signal defines what is done on other sims?
It rings alarm bells to me that a sim's behavior would depend on
which host it runs on.

-- 
Pedro Alves