From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16370 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2012 16:54:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 16360 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2012 16:54:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from usmamail.tilera.com (HELO USMAMAIL.TILERA.COM) (12.216.194.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:54:05 +0000 Received: from [10.7.0.51] (10.9.0.23) by USMAExch2.tad.internal.tilera.com (10.3.0.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.694.0; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:54:04 -0400 Message-ID: <5037B1A8.5020207@tilera.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:54:00 -0000 From: Jeff Kenton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 CentOS/3.1.16-2.el6.centos Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Subject: Re: GDB test suite question References: <5037A142.3020505@tilera.com> <87fw7cl00t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87fw7cl00t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00746.txt.bz2 On 08/24/2012 12:36 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Jeff> What is a reasonable target number for "unexpected failures" when > Jeff> running the test suite for a specific processor? > > In addition to what Jan said, if it is a new port, I think you just have > to look through a bunch of them and see what is happening. > > Tom Thanks for the answers. It's a pretty new port -- Tilera TILE-Gx. When I first submitted it there were a LARGE number of failures. Now it's better (113), but I wanted to see how far I still had to go. --jeff