From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1951 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2012 15:44:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 1940 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2012 15:44:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from usmamail.tilera.com (HELO USMAMAIL.TILERA.COM) (12.216.194.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:44:03 +0000 Received: from [10.7.0.51] (10.9.0.23) by USMAExch2.tad.internal.tilera.com (10.3.0.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.694.0; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:44:03 -0400 Message-ID: <5037A142.3020505@tilera.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:44:00 -0000 From: Jeff Kenton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 CentOS/3.1.16-2.el6.centos Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: GDB test suite question Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00734.txt.bz2 What is a reasonable target number for "unexpected failures" when running the test suite for a specific processor? Thanks. --jeff kenton