Re: [RFA][2/5] New port: Cell BE SPU (valops.c fix)

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-22T19:28:52Z

On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:25:48AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote:
> > VALUE_TO_REGISTER has only one caller and eight definitions (plus some
> > documentation). It shouldn't be hard to update it. What additional
> > information do you need? Would passing the two values instead of one
> > regnum and one contents do it?
>
> Or, possibly another gdbarch method, VALUE_TO_REGISTER_BITFIELD, which
> can be left unset, provoking an internal error in value_assign?

I'm not even quite sure how bitfields come into it. The register
type's a builtin_type_vec128.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery