From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24217 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2009 16:57:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 24204 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2009 16:57:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from web112519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (HELO web112519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (98.137.26.114) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:57:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 17048 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jul 2009 16:57:04 -0000 Message-ID: <502692.14180.qm@web112519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Received: from [123.237.139.128] by web112519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:57:04 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:09:00 -0000 From: paawan oza Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch To: Michael Snyder Cc: Hui Zhu , Mark Kettenis , "pedro@codesourcery.com" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" In-Reply-To: <4A70EB0C.4070109@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00746.txt.bz2 Hi, I am trying to insatall expect and tcl...but expect gave some compilation e= rror on suse. mostly I tested this patch at an instruction level.=20 So I am pretty confident about this patch, that I have not missed any singl= e floating point instruction. : ) Regards, Oza. --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Michael Snyder wrote: > From: Michael Snyder > Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch > To: "paawan oza" > Cc: "Hui Zhu" , "Mark Kettenis" , "pedro@codesourcery.com" , "gdb-patches@sourc= eware.org" > Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 6:06 AM > paawan oza wrote: > > Hi Michael, > >=20 > > Mu understanding about the patch Acceptance is ; > > when I integrate relevant test cases regading the > patch to the gdb test suite then it could go to mainline. > > correct ? >=20 > That, plus I'm hoping that once we get past the formatting > and attachment difficulties, we can get a little more > technical > review from the other maintainers. >=20 > > For that I am wrorking on expect scripting, soon I > will integrate some test cases related to patch. >=20 > How's that going for you?=A0 I hope my example was > helpful. > I know the dejagnu framework is pretty hard to get started > in. >=20 >=20