From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13272 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2012 15:02:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 13256 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2012 15:02:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:01:50 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1SylI6-0003Dp-7Q from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:01:50 -0700 Received: from NA1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.181]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:01:49 -0700 Received: from [0.0.0.0] ([172.16.63.104]) by NA1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:01:49 -0700 Message-ID: <50212DFC.7070601@mentor.com> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:02:00 -0000 From: Luis Gustavo Reply-To: "Gustavo, Luis" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, ppc] Fix hw *points for embedded ppc in a threaded environment. References: <501FD5D6.30005@mentor.com> <20120806170405.GA9225@host2.jankratochvil.net> <502014B3.1090109@mentor.com> <20120806202734.GB2079@host2.jankratochvil.net> <50212C53.3020109@mentor.com> <20120807145947.GA569@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20120807145947.GA569@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2 On 08/07/2012 11:59 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:55:15 +0200, Luis Gustavo wrote: >> I'm ok with coming up with that testcase. Should we go ahead and >> have this in and the test commited shortly afterwards? > > If you are really going to write that testcase I find it easier later during > analyses to have fix + testcase in a single commit. The testcase should be > simple, shouldn't be? 7.5 is not going to be released these days yet. Yeah. You're right. Luis